Skip to main content
Manteca CA banner
File #: 25-578    Version: 1 Name:
Type: Consent Status: Agenda Ready
File created: 10/28/2025 In control: CITY COUNCIL
On agenda: 12/2/2025 Final action:
Title: Adopt a resolution accepting, filing, and making the findings identified in the City's AB 1600 Annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 and Five-Year (Fiscal Year 2020-21 through Fiscal Year 2024-25) report on Development Impact Fees.
Attachments: 1. Attachment 1 - Resolution, 2. Attachment 2 - AB 1600 Annual and Five-Year Report
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

City Council Agenda
Memo to:
Manteca City Council


From:
Matthew Boring, Interim Finance Director


Prepared by:
Loretta Olmos, Senior Budget Analyst


Date:
December 2, 2025


Subject:
Receive and File Report on the Review of Development Impact Fees Subject to AB 1600 Annual (Fiscal Year 2024-25) and Five-Year (Fiscal Year 2020-21 through Fiscal Year 2024-25) Reporting Requirements

Recommendation:
title
Adopt a resolution accepting, filing, and making the findings identified in the City's AB 1600 Annual report for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2025 and Five-Year (Fiscal Year 2020-21 through Fiscal Year 2024-25) report on Development Impact Fees.

body
Background:
The City is authorized by state law to collect development impact fees from new development to fund public improvements and services to support the new development. AB 1600 (Government Code Sections 66000-66008), known as the Mitigation Fee Act, requires cities to justify and account for developer fees which they enact, increase, or impose as a condition of new development for the purposes of financing public facilities and improvements. This bill applies to developer fees increased or imposed on or after January 1, 1989. Government Code Sections 66000-66008 generally contain the following four requirements:
* A local jurisdiction must follow the process set forth in the bill and make certain determinations regarding the purpose and use of the fees and establish a "nexus" or connection between a development project or class of project and the public improvement being financed with the fee.
* The revenue fee must be segregated from the general fund in order to avoid commingling of public improvement fees and the general fund.
* If a local jurisdiction has had possession of a developer fee for five years or more and has not committed that money to a project or actually spent that money, then it must make findings describing the continuing need for that money. In addition, an annual report mu...

Click here for full text